Subject	Re: So was the new style Z32 spoiler an engineering decision?
Posted by	Technomancer on March 08, 2011 at 4:45 PM
	This message has been viewed 297 times.
In Reply To	So was the new style Z32 spoiler an engineering decision? posted by zellamay on March 08, 2011 at 04:11 PM
Message	The article I read on the zero-lift engineering was when the Z came out -> 90-93 spoiler. I have no info on the 94+ wing-style spoilers, but the general consensus is that they provide more downforce than the original. The only person I know that has their own simulation is Ni[x]it. He might have an opinion. - John
Follow Ups	Is a spoiler necessary? - hijack 17:22:46 03/05/11 If you've seen the post's that I have, and you plan on - JonnyZ(SoCal) 17:48:03 03/05/11 yes (n/m) - ZiNnYc 18:19:24 03/06/11 Definitely replace the spoiler, do not just delete - Technomancer 10:22:55 03/07/11 Never had any issues with speeds north of 170mph (n/m) - Jc (Houston) 18:05:20 03/07/11 Re: LOL. in a word "no". a car that weighs as much as - tognot 00:04:30 03/08/11 Spoiler - i say yes - MikeC(NZ) 05:25:00 03/08/11 Re: look what Kuah runs on his car. Look what Nascar.. - tognot 08:59:39 03/08/11 the spoiler on the Z was not designed to provide actual - Technomancer 15:07:15 03/08/11 So was the new style Z32 spoiler an engineering decision? - zellamay 16:11:28 03/08/11 Re: So was the new style Z32 spoiler an engineering decision? - Technomancer 16:45:18 03/08/11 thanks for all the replies - i'm going with a fiberglass oem - hijack 17:47:35 03/08/11 Re: considering where I get my info and where you get yours - tognot 22:18:32 03/08/11 I guess you haven't read Smith very closely. - Technomancer 09:50:49 03/09/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.